The Wofford Terriers take on the Texas A&M Aggies in an interesting non-conference matchup on Monday afternoon. Reed Arena plays host to the festivities, with both teams coming off a win. Wofford knocked off previously unbeaten Coastal Carolina by an 11-point margin on Tuesday evening to improve to 3-2 on the season. Texas A&M took care of business with a 17-point win over SE Louisiana, and the Aggies sit at 4-1 this season.
Tip-off is at 1 p.m. ET in College Station. William Hill Sportsbook lists the Aggies as six-point home favorites, while the over-under, or total number of points Vegas thinks will be scored, is 133.5 in the latest Texas A&M vs. Wofford odds. Before making any Wofford vs. Texas A&M picks, check out the college basketball predictions and betting advice from the SportsLine Projection Model.
The SportsLine Projection Model simulates every Division I college basketball game 10,000 times. Over the past four-plus years, the proprietary computer model has generated an impressive profit of almost $2,600 for $100 players on its top-rated college basketball picks against the spread. It’s also off to a fast start in the 2020-21 season, going 8-4 on all its top-rated picks and returning well over $300. Anyone who has followed it has seen huge returns.
Now, the model has set its sights on Texas A&M vs. Wofford. You can head to SportsLine to see its picks. Here are several college basketball odds for Wofford vs. Texas A&M:
- Texas A&M vs. Wofford spread: Texas A&M -6
- Texas A&M vs. Wofford over-under: 133.5 points
- TAMU: The Aggies are 1-4 against the spread this season
- WOFF The Terriers are 8-7 against the spread in the last 15 games as an underdog
Why Texas A&M can cover
The Aggies are an above-average defensive team, allowing just 62.4 points per game. Texas A&M ranks in the top quartile of the country in adjusted defensive efficiency, and the Aggies are a top-10 team in creating turnovers, forcing a giveaway on 27.5 percent of possessions. Texas A&M also excels in limiting its opponents on 2-point shots (48.9 percent), with above-average marks in defensive rebound rate and steal rate.
From there, Texas A&M is a solid 2-point shooting team (56.2 percent) and the Aggies are very potent on the offensive glass, grabbing 34.5 percent of their own missed shots. Wofford is a shaky defensive rebounding team (69.4 percent), and the Aggies have a severe edge in physicality and athleticism, as manifested by the Terriers’ very modest block rate (6.1 percent) and steal rate (8.2 percent).
Why Wofford can cover
Wofford is a potent shooting team, posting an effective field goal percentage of 53.2 percent. The Terriers are converting 53.6 percent of their 2-point shots and 35.2 percent of their 3-pointers so far this season. From there, Wofford leads country in 3-point attempt rate, taking more than 60 percent of its shots from beyond the arc, and the Terriers are capable of a barrage at any moment.
They are also above-average on the offensive glass, grabbing 30.4 percent of their own misses, and senior guard Storm Murphy is a breakout player, averaging 19.8 points, 4.8 assists and 4.2 rebounds per game while shooting 40.6 percent from beyond the arc. Defensively, Wofford isn’t elite, but it does have a path to success against Texas A&M. The Aggies are ranked outside the top 300 nationally in turnover rate, giving the ball away on 26.4 percent of possessions, and that havoc could be crucial for Wofford.
How to make Texas A&M vs. Wofford picks
SportsLine’s model is leaning over on the total, with 11 players projected to score at least seven points. The model also says one side of the spread hits in well over 60 percent of simulations. You can only see the pick at SportsLine.
So who wins Wofford vs. Texas A&M? And which side of the spread is hitting in well over 60 percent of simulations? Visit SportsLine right now to see which side of the Wofford vs. Texas A&M spread you need to jump on, all from the computer model that has crushed its college basketball picks.
#Texas #Wofford #odds #line #college #basketball #picks #Dec #predictions #proven #model
Source